Under Community Review
over 1 year ago

Hi David,

Thank you for submitting your idea for improving SDL TMS. We're currently looking at how TQA is performed across the supply chain so this is a timely idea to submit and will help us shape how we move forward with this. I'll leave under community review for now in case anyone else has feedback on this topic.

Regards,

David

QA Check Override in a whole job

When you need to upload a project containing lots of files showing false positives, it would be great if we could use an override function to skip TMS QA Check on the whole set of files, only after the results are showing on screen. I'm not talking about skipping QA check beforehand, but only in cases in which you already got tons of false errors and you just need to save some valuable time in final submission.

Current process is specially long and tedious when dealing with "big" files, and some flexibility would be awesome.

  • This function is much needed and long overdue! It will save us a lot of work and frustration.

    Helga

  • Hey Tudor,

    Additional feedback from another project.

    MIC_1083

    448695

    EN-US > JA

    /01_FC.mif.sdlxliff

    175

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 33, 34

    448696

    EN-US > JA

    /02_TOC.mif.sdlxliff

    17

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

    448697

    EN-US > JA

    /03_About.mif.sdlxliff

    572

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 46, 48, 50, 52

    448698

    EN-US > JA

    /04_Safety.mif.sdlxliff

    124

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

    448699

    EN-US > JA

    /05_Ch1_HR_Option.mif.sdlxliff

    1078

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 76, 106, 114, 116, 162, 164, 167, 170, 173, 176

    448700

    EN-US > JA

    /06_Ch2_Maintenance.mif.sdlxliff

    270

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

    448920

    EN-US > JA

    /07_App_Conforming.mif.sdlxliff

    245

    The source and the target are the same on the following lines: 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

  • Hello Tudor,

    Here is some feedback from our team:

    There are two Carestream jobs and the number of files is 628 per job. We're going to have to manually override the QA check for most of the files because they are going to have false positives. This is going to take HOURS for a job of approx. 700 new words because you need to override each file individually. When you calculate what an employees hour is worth, this will be a significant waste of resources.

    JobID - 22,656

    JobID - 22,680

  • Hi everyone,

    Can you provide me with some example of "big" files and large jobs for which you encounter this low performance? It would help to understand the current limitations.

    Thank you in advance,

    Tudor

  • Paraphrased From Team Member: I understand that there have been issues in other languages but I cannot accept that spending hours on performing a QA Override and submitting files that have been pushed back. We work overtime to do this absurd task. We really have to find a quick solution until a final solution is in place because the projects usually contain many, many files. We still have a project in TMS with 94 files that have been pushed back.