I have the following problem with Studio 2015 when working on project packages:
For some source segments with a match in the target, the TM translation window is empty and says "no match".
Here is an example (segment 608, 86% match):
When I select the source segment in full or in part and make a contextual search, I get the same answer ("no match", though the target segment is full with text).
When I take the text as a single document (sdlxliff), at least I can see the results after making a contextual search (which is not normal either).
Anyways, when my client sends me a package, he awaits a package in return and nothing else. He tried to help me but couldn't understand and said all my project parameters look normal.
Here is one of the screen caps I sent him:
I hope you can help because this problem means less assignements (I won't get anymore packages until the problem is solved).
Thanks a lot in advance!
PS: my client is an agency working with many other translators and I am the only one encountering this problem.
Hello Anne-Laure Guichard
Here on the screenshot, in segment 608, could you please confirm where the match is coming from? It is already there from somewhere, but if you could not find it in the TM as an automatic lookup match, where does it come from? Was the file pre-translated by the agency?
Maybe the memories themselves do not contain these matches? If I understand correctly you do not receive neither automatic matches, nor concordance matches - could you please confirm?
Could you please run an analysis on the file and post here the results, similar to this?
Also, do you know maybe what version of Studio is the agency using?
Looking forward to hearing back from you.
Thank you very much for your answer!
I am going to try to answer your questions.
I don't know exactly from which of the many client's TMs in the package the match in segment 608 is coming from, but I know I can find it through a contextual search when working with a single file and with the client's TMs sent separately with their names not beginning with "Request_...", which you can see in my parameters screen cap (I forgot to say this).
So I would say the TMs with their names not beginning with "Request_..." do contain this matches. As for the ones beginning with "Request_", I don't know...
Nor do I know if one may say the client pre-translated the file, but the fact is that when I open it, matches are already displayed in the right column, for example for this segment with a 86% match.
I am not sure to understand the difference between automatic matches and concordance matches: if concordance matches mean what I get through a contextual search ("recherche contextuelle" in French), then I don't get anything when working from the package (only when working from a single file).
If automatic matches mean the text displayed in the right column, then I get them, they are displayed before I click in the target segment.
Here are the results of the analysis:
As for the agency's Studio version, it is 2019. But the other translators of packages who have 2015 like me don't have this problem.
I hope this helps you to understand?
PS: Here a screen cap of my TM parameters when working with a single file and with the client's TMs sent separately with their names not beginning with "Request_...":
Here is what happens when clicking in target segment 608 (nothing):
And here is what happens when I make a contextual search on a part of the sentence:
All of these 3 caps are for working with the single fr-FR file without opening the package and with the client's TMs sent separately with their names not beginning with "Request_..."
More about my last screen cap:
- when I select the whole sentence the search result is zero (for an 86% match...);
- when working from the package, it is actually the same: when I make a contextual search on a part of the sentence I get something but when I select the whole sentence the search result is zero.
But in some cases, when working from the package and there is only one word in the source segment, then I can't do anything else but selecting the whole "sentence", and the search result is still zero.
Here an example from another project:
(Please excuse me for these many messages but all this is pretty confusing for me too!)
Hello Anne-Laure Guichard
Apologies for the delay in my reply, I have not seen your messages.
For future reference, kindly tag people using @ and their name (without a space) so they would get notified.
There are quite a few things to check and discuss here, and might be easier with live voice and screensharing - I wonder if you would be available for a Skype call tomorrow afternoon, from 14:00 or from 16:00 CET?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Dear Greta Magyar
Thank you for your reply, yes a Skype call would (hopefully) be useful!
Today I was not available and tomorrow (Thursday) I am not either, but I will have time on Friday afternoon: what about you?